Was just flicking through my reviews to read some responses, and was surprised at what I saw. It seems that as soon as somebody writes something remotely critical (helpful) about an artwork, their review gets attacked as useless by retarded 12 year olds.
Also what surprises me is when somebody merely writes a one line or one word comment such as "RESPECT" or "WOOT!" people unanimously find the review "helpful!" when there is nothing the author could possibly draw from it.
Sure, in the past I've written a couple of useless reviews that are kinda painful to read, but 95% of the time I only review to give suggestions that I think would help a fellow artist improve. Correspondingly, NGers think that around 95% of my reviews are useless. I ask you.
Anyway, probably shouldn't expect that any thing much that isn't stupid or retarded would appear on the internet. What do you reckon?